Posted by: thirunavukarasual | October 1, 2010

About AIADMK General Seceratory Dr.J.Jayalalitha

About Dr.J.Jayalalitha

Affectionately called Ammu, Puratchi Thalaivi

Profession Actor turned Politician

Date of birth Feb-24-1948

Profession Actor

Place of birth Mysore

Family Father -Jeyaram

Mother: Sandya


Education Matriculation

Schools attended

* Bishop cotton Girls High School, Bangalore.

* Presentation Convent Church Park, Chennai.

As a dancer Well versed in Bharata Natyam, Mohini Attam, Kathak,Manipuri.

Would have been Lawyer

Debut * Kannada film:’ chinnada Gombe’

* Telugu film:’ Manushulu Mamathalu’

* Tamil film :’vennira aadai ‘

* With MGR:”Aayirarhthil Oruvan”

* With Shivaji: ‘Galaata Kalyaanam’

Rise to fame character As a vampish lead in G. Krishna’s James Bond-type hit Goodachari 116 she was noticed by everyone..

Entry into politics First as the Secretary of the AIADMK, then was nominated to the Rajya Sabha.

Awards * 1972- Kalaimamani award from the government of Tamilnadu.

* 1991- Was conferred the Degree of Doctor of Literature(D.Litt) by the University of Madras.

* 1992- Dr MGR Medical University conferred the degree of Doctor of Science.

* 1993-Madurai Kamaraj University conferred the degree of Doctor of Letters.

* 2003-Tamil Nadu Agricultural University conferred the degree of Doctor of Science.

* 2003-Bharathidasan University conferred the degree of Doctor of Letters (Honoris Causa)

Influential persons in her life * Mother Celine(school head mistress)

* Her mother for her career in films.

* Dr. M.G.R for her career in politics.

Worst Moment When she was attacked in the Tamil Nadu Assembly by then ruling party people.


* In 1982 when she gave her maiden speech about ‘pennin perumai’ which was applauded by Dr. M.G.R

*In 1984 her Rajya sabha maiden speech which impressed Mrs.Indira Gandhi

Lows The passing away of her mother and Dr.M.G.R.

For the welfare of women * Cradle baby scheme.

* All women police station.

Enemy Mr. Karunanidhi

Friend Sasikala

Special interst Studying Law

Religion Very religious

Hobbies Has a large private library with a huge collection of books

Likes to watch Old tamil, hindi and english movies

Impressed by the book “Wild Swans”

Facts * After completion of Matriculation in 1964, she won a scholarship from Government of India for higher studies but did not accept it as she took up a career in films.

* Played ‘herself’ as a politician/chief minister in the movie ‘Neenga Nalla Erukkanum’

* Jayalalitha’s assets were worth Rs 2.01 crore, after five years in power, her assets were calculated to be disproportionate by Rs 66.65.

* Out of the 468 gold items seized during the raid, the ‘ottiyanam’, weighing 1,044 gms with 2,389 diamond, emerald and ruby stones, and engraved with a dancing peacock in the middle alone was worth Rs 46.79 lakhs.

* The first Woman Leader of the Opposition in the Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly.

* She was elected from Andipatti Assembly constituency in February 2002 to become the Chief Minister of Tamilnadu.

Chief Minister * from 24-06-1991 to 12-05-1996,

* from 14-05-2001 to 21-09-2001and

* from 02-03-2002 to -12-05-2006

Portfolio’s handled by her as C.M. Public, General Administration, Indian Administrative Service, Indian Police Service, other All India Services, District Revenue Officers, Home, Police and Minorities Welfare.

Address “Veda Nilayam”, 81/36 Poes Garden, Chennai – 600 086.

About her life “One-third of my life was dominated by my mother, the other part — a major one — was dominated by MGR. Two-third of my life is thus over. One third remains and this part of my life remains for myself but there are some responsibilities and duties to be fulfilled”.

Posted by: thirunavukarasual | October 1, 2010

Ayodhya judgement

An Indian court has ruled that a disputed holy site in Ayodhya should be split between Hindus and Muslims. Hindus believe the site is the birthplace of one of their most revered deities, Lord Ram, but Muslims say they have worshipped there for generations.

The three judges, two Hindu and one Muslim, were divided on whether a Hindu temple had been demolished to build a mosque on the site and on whether the mosque was legitimate, according to Muslim tenets, but in a majority verdict, they gave control of the main disputed section to Hindus.

Here are key excerpts from the summary of the court’s ruling:

“The disputed site is the birth place of Lord Ram.

“The disputed building was constructed by Babur, the year is not certain but it was built against the tenets of Islam. Thus, it cannot have the character of a mosque.

“The disputed structure was constructed on the site of old structure after demolition of the same. The Archaeological Survey of India has proved that the structure was a massive Hindu religious structure.

“It is established that the property in suit is the site of Janm Bhumi [birthplace] of Ram Chandra Ji and Hindus in general had the right to worship Charan [Lord Ram’s slippers], Sita Rasoi [Goddess Sita’s kitchen], other idols and other object of worship existed upon the property in suit. It is also established that Hindus have been worshipping the place in dispute as Janm Sthan, ie a birthplace as deity and visiting it as a sacred place of pilgrimage as of right since time immemorial.

“After the construction of the disputed structure it is proved the deities were installed inside the disputed structure on 22/23 Dec 1949.

“It is also proved that the outer courtyard was in exclusive possession of Hindus and they were worshipping throughout and in the inner courtyard (in the disputed structure) they were also worshipping.

“It is also established that the disputed structure cannot be treated as a mosque as it came into existence against the tenets of Islam.

“Accordingly, all the three sets of parties – ie Muslims, Hindus and Nirmohi Akhara [a Hindu sect] – are declared joint title holders of the property/premises in dispute… to the extent of one third share each for using and managing the same for worshipping. A preliminary decree to this effect is passed.

“However, it is further declared that the portion below the central dome where at present the idol is kept in makeshift temple will be allotted to Hindus in final decree.

“It is further directed that Nirmohi Akhara will be allotted share including that part which is shown by the words Ram Chabutra [Ram’s square] and Sita Rasoi [on a map of the site].

“It is further clarified that even though all the three parties are declared to have one third share each, however if while allotting exact portions some minor adjustment in the share is to be made then the same will be made and the adversely affected party may be compensated by allotting some portion of the adjoining land which has been acquired by the central government.

“The parties are at liberty to file their suggestions for actual partition by metes and bounds within three months.

“Status quo… shall be maintained for a period of three months unless this order is modified or vacated earlier.”

Posted by: thirunavukarasual | October 1, 2010


The Lucknow Bench of the Allahabad High Court today delivered a verdict on the disputed Ramjanmabhoomi Babri Masjid issue, calling for the disputed land to be divided into three parts with Hindus, Muslims and the Nirmohi Akhada sharing the parts.

The decision has evoked widespread reaction from politicians, lawyers and eminent personalities in the country. Here’s what some of them had to say in the initial hours after the verdict

Mr Zafaryab Jilani, Sunni Waqf Board lawyer – “We will appeal for declaration and possession of the entire land. There is no need for public resentment, no reason for gloom. We hope peace and tranquility will be maintained throughout the country.”

Mr Mohan Bhagwat, Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) Sarsangchalak – “The judgment has paved the way for the construction of Ram temple in Ayodhya. The judgment is not a win or loss for anybody. We invite everybody, including Muslims, to help build the temple.”

Mr Janardhan Dwivedi, General Secretary Congress Party – “Congress has held that the controversy should either be solved through talks or the verdict of the court should be accepted. The court has given the verdict. We should all welcome the judgment.”

Ms Mayawati, Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister – “Please maintain communal harmony and beware of forces that try to spread communal strife. If anyone tries to spoil the peace in Uttar Pradesh, the state government too will take strict action.”

Mr Mohammed Hashim Ansari, Litigant – “I welcome the court decision. I appeal to all Muslims in the country not to get upset over the decision.”

Mr Nritya Gopal Das, Ramjanmabhoomi Trust chief Mahant – “It is the responsibility of Hindus and Muslims to ensure peace prevails even after the verdict. It (verdict) should not affect the composite culture of the country. Hindu-Muslim ties need to become stronger after the verdict.”

Mr Lalu Prasad, Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) chief – “Maintain harmony and brotherhood. Let the text of the judgment come, there is still confusion on what the verdict is.”

Stay tuned for more news on the Ayodhya verdict and reactions.